#Flinto vs framer studio code

(2020) Further studies are required to provide clear guidelines on analysing MIF. (2019) The response of MIF is highly nonlinear Wijaya et al. (2019) Large variations in the literature and codes cause confusion to practicing engineers Madiawati et al. (2017) There cannot be a single model to represent MIF instead the models need to vary from one structure to the other Alwashali et al. (2016) The interaction between the frame and the wall is complicated Mohyeddin et al. (2013) Conflicting views of MIF modelling have resulted in the 'deconstruction' of the masonry-infill structures Sigmund and Penava (2014) While some researchers showed that infill walls led to the failure of the building, others have suggested that the walls were beneficial Huang et al. (2011) MIF does not have the simplicity and accuracy necessary for design engineers Chrysostomou and Asteris (2012) Uncertainties in defining strength properties and modelling exist in both with and without openings in MIF Sipos et al. (2009) MIF is a complex and composite structure to model Asteris et al. Table 1: Comments from past researchers on analysing MIF Blackard et al. Despite the complexity, the research in the field of MIF had begun as early as 1930s and continues to evolve for the reasons stated in Table 1. Based on the concept of the multi-line defence against earthquakes, it is suggested that infilled frames should be designed with the ‘strong frame-weak infill’ principle, in which frame and weak infill will form a two-line system of defence against earthquakes. It is proposed to enlarge the moment and shear design values of columns to consider the local effect of infill on bounding frames in design practice. Bounding frame bore a greater internal force than bare frame, especially at the end of columns, which affected the failure mode of the bounding frame. Moreover, HCB infill panels incurred the most serious damage amongst the infills, which may jeopardise the in-plane and out-plane stability of infill walls. The experiment showed the complicated interaction between bounding frame and infill panel as well as the failure mechanism of frames with weak infill. These infilled frames exhibited superior seismic performance to the bare frame in terms of strength and energy dissipation capacity. The test results indicated that the bounding frames of infilled frame specimens had the same failure mode as the bare frame. Three types of masonry infill were used, which included solid clay bricks (SCB), hollow concrete blocks (HCB) and aerated concrete blocks (ACB). Particular emphasis was placed on the influence of the masonry materials and aspect ratio of infill walls on the hysteretic characteristics of the infilled frames.

#Flinto vs framer studio code

Large-scale infilled RC frame specimens, which were fabricated to simulate those in as-built RC frame buildings designed in accordance with the provisions of Chinese seismic code (GB50011-2001), were tested under reversed cyclic loading. (The horizontal velocity is less than the vertical velocity.This paper presents an experimental study of the seismic performance of a category of reinforced concrete (RC) frame with weak infill panel and the complicated interaction between bounding frame and infill panel at different loading stages. Horizontal out: the movement starts in the vertical direction and ends in the horizontal direction.(The horizontal velocity is greater than the vertical velocity.) Vertical out: the movement starts in the horizontal direction and ends in the vertical direction.An element can also do arc motion, which usually occurs when the ratio of the element changes.Īrc motion is sometimes vertical out, sometimes horizontal out. When an element moves, the line (track) it draws is called the motion path, which can be a linear motion or an arc motion.Īn element moves linearly by default, and the motion path forms a straight line or diagonal. No-ease/linear: an object that moves at a constant speed.Ease-out: fast at the beginning, slow at the end (commonly used for incoming elements).Ease-in: slow at the beginning, fast at the end (commonly used for outgoing elements).

We can easily understand this movement with the help of simple physical knowledge: